![]() ![]() The federal government could just “explore” forever, or under pressure from the super rich they could create a tiny exclusionary program. ![]() And this tells us that wind is blowing in our sails.īut we have come this far before, promises made have been broken. Now newspapers rarely take a non-mainstream position, they go where they think the wind is blowing. Yesterday, the editorial, the newspapers’ official position came out not only supporting regularization, but (mostly) supporting our position. Last week, government officials confirmed to the Toronto Star – ‘off the record’ – that regularization was on the horizon. We launched a petition, met with MPs and government officials and most importantly escalated migrant organizing. ![]() So at the start of the summer we began a new push. This is new, because the reason given to deny permanent residency rights to migrant workers is that we are deemed “low-skilled.” Launch a New Petition Then in May, Parliament passed a symbolic motion to support permanent resident status for migrants of all skill levels. That sounded like public relations language that wouldn’t result in meaningful changes.īut thousands of migrants, part of the 40 organizations in the Migrant Rights Network coalition, identified Status for All as their priority for action in our survey this spring. In our defense, it didn’t seem very promising, the letter says the government should “further explore” regularization. So much so that back in December when Prime Minister Trudeau put regularization (permanent resident status for undocumented people) in his mandate letter, many of us dismissed it. They keep trying to trick the rest of us into attacking migrants, because when we are fighting each other, we are not holding those at the top accountable.Īs a result, status for all, especially for undocumented people has often seemed unattainable. Permanent resident status for everyone has always been opposed by the richest few at the top because by denying it, they can exploit migrants more. Paid low wages, they did the most dangerous jobs, and did not get citizenship rights. ![]() The railroad that connected the East and the West, and allowed Canada as we know it to even exist, was built by Chinese Railroad Workers. While the massive expansion is new, temporary migration is as old as Canada itself. Undocumented people are criminalized, living in fear of detention and deportation. This means that a total of 1.7 million people do not have decent jobs, worker protections, or access to universal healthcare. As a result, there are now half a million undocumented people in the country. Most of them cannot stay permanently, and eventually are forced to stay here without papers or leave. Where there used to be thousands, there are now at least 1.2 million people on temporary work, study and refugee claimants permits. This degree program requires a total of 120 semester credit hours, including at least 40. From national coverage and issues to local headlines and stories across the country, the Star is your home. Temporary immigration has really only ballooned to where it is today over the last 20 years. Our demand is radical in its simplicity: Permanent resident status for every person in the country immediately, and permanent resident status on arrival for every migrant in the future. These calls – Landed Status Now, Status Now, or Status for All – have unified migrants for decades. Their signs all read “Landed Status Now.” But if MPs won’t demand better of themselves, voters must: At minimum, the BOIE must operate, as a general rule, with its doors open.Temporary Migration or Landed Status Now? Perhaps it’s not surprising that people for whom “not illegal” has become the standard for defensible conduct can’t run a Board of Internal Economy very well. Very well: let the NDP defend using public money to send out partisan junk mail, on its merits. To the taxpayer, the annoyance of having to pay for partisan junk mail would be much the same, whether it were legal or not. What we too rarely hear is a defence of the conduct itself - which is the basis on which voters ought to be judging the parties involved. We didn’t break the law when we talked jobs and patronage positions with a local candidate we very much wanted to drop out of the race, say Ontario Liberals. It’s a common message: It was legal for Nigel Wright to give Mike Duffy money, say Conservatives. Article contentĮssentially they argue they were within the rules, and that’s that. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Manage Print Subscription / Tax Receipt. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |